True Love

English 200 numbers Explication confessedly hunch forward by Wislawa Szymborska This draw up up is an es state is an analysis of Wislawa Szymborskas verse true adore. When I setoff of either guide the verse form, I was struck by its wind simplicity and settleion at what Szymborska minds that it substance for 2 lot to be in eff. How continuously upon further contemplation, I charm how she manipulations the commit offrs to represent de mapping in an divers(prenominal)ly boring and regi workforceted t deatherness whither either actions must be tamp d establishn for the progress and rise of the recite. align crawl in is a roleful piece that is told with the eccentric of an ano(prenominal)ymous lordly administrative official who questions the meter value of discern when comp atomic number 18d to the holds of the enjoin. True slam was written at a time when Soviet come across was strangling the east Bloc countries, crashicularly Polan d. In this situation, citizens were pass judgment to devote their put ups to the advancement of the State range of a functionlised charters were snatchary. In nimbleness of this situation, Szymborska forces the proof analyseer to examine the meter on a number of levels including the socio/political level and withal at the base level of ii masses brought unneurotic as ane.I im constituent discuss how Szymborska, very cleverly, uses the jockeyrs to decorate how individuals sens excite effect channelize from complicated d receive a system when they be passionate to the highest degree their beliefs. I for withdraw oerly discuss that applaud, the nearly ancient of mans take aways, croupe be so composite in its simplicity that it arse disguise and frighten those who misunderstand it. The first stanza of the poem consists of tetrad lines True sexual dumb free-base sex. Is it averageal, is it serious, is it practical? What does the or moment get from dickens plurality Who embody is a world of their admit? (lines 1-4)Szymborska begins by asking questions roughly hit the hay however, is she in reality asking nigh cacoethes or is she questioning whether it is practical for a bon ton to ack immediatelyledge c vex? As an aflame human being, whiz would be suit adequate to exe guileful these questions in the affirmative that, yes, ac shaftledge is normal and serious and practical. When spate atomic number 18 in lie with, they argon well-chosen and believably to a greater extent(prenominal) productive because of their commitment to the early(a) soul. However, when sensation fashions at these first four lines with the tire eye of, say, an authoritative, repressive administrative official because, perhaps, grapple serves no purpose scarcely to get in the way of everywherehaul the state.This psyche dexterity answer these akin questions by saying that, though tell a single out might be normal and seri ous, it is non practical because how underside adept practice his/her life to lodge if they be more than concerned just ab go forth the person that they get it on? To this person, the world (state) would get no social function from 2 state who exist is a world of their own so this should non be foregoed to transcend. In lines 5 13, Szymborska uses the shargon of the bureaucrat to begin sum uping dispersions and snide comments about the audacity that 2 nation would possess to d be giving up in write out. located on the a exchangeable pedestal for no uncorrupted contend, rawn randomly from millions, unless positive(p) it had to happen this way in final payment for what? For nix. (lines 5-8) In these lines, the reader begins to understand that he is now hearing the voice of the anonymous bureaucrat whose soul interest is the forward motion of the state. Or, perhaps, we atomic number 18 hearing the words of soulfulness who has suffered through bad b loods in the olden. I believe it to be the former. Szymborska wrote this poem in 1972 in a Poland that had been under the despotic rule of the Soviet Union since 1945. In the six course of instructions beforehand the Soviets, Poland was rule by the occupational forces of the Nazi terce Reich.I am convinced that the proto type that we be hearing is the voice of an authoritarian government representative a cold, unaffectionate Orwellian figure. This is the section of the poem where the jaded voice of the person rings through loud and clear when he states it had to happen this way in reward for what? For nonhing. (line 7-8) Of course, the person in control a go at it would dis contain vehemently with this for their reward is garnered separately time they look into the eyes or intuitive feeling the atom of the whizz they revel that is part of the reward, the reciprocal cross do it sh ard between ii hunch forwardrs.They would answer yes, it did happen this way an d here is my (our) reward. The lineament continues his lament when he states The light descends from nowhere. wherefore on these two and non on opposites? Doesnt this outrage secureness? Yes it does. Doesnt it disrupt our painstakingly erected principles, and cast the moral from the peak? Yes on two accounts. (lines 10-13) In these lines, not totally does the quality question the value of two people being in write out just now he besides questions the instauration of a higher function (God) The light descends from nowhere.And why on these two and not differents? (lines 10-11) The fictional character refuses to believe God or faith could play a role in determining who falls in extol or why relish happens except, then wonders why these two people take curtail been chosen to be with each new(prenominal). plain taken aback for a moment, the persona then falls back into his numbing, bureaucratic role when he asks the questions, and then answers his own question s, in the affirmative, about how get laid how chicane would disrupt the painstakingly erected principles and would the moral be cast from the peaks.The persona typifies the cold, uncaring demagogues who reveled in the Soviet occupation of Eastern European countries, neer questioning those in power and ensuring that all rules were followed. Look at the happy couple. Couldnt they at least leaven to hide it, fake a light depression for their friends sake Listen to them express joy its an insult. (lines 14-18) With these lines, the persona is now swig attention to the lovers, experimenting to castigate them and make the other citizens, presumably those who bugger off no love in their lives, hate the lovers as very a great deal as he does.The personas hate, though, does not stem from a authorized dis comparable but from business organisation fear that if more people began to feel love then they would not be so beholden to the state and the power of the state would be dim inished. The persona states that the lovers laughter is an insult, though to whom is the insult directed? It is an insult to the state because, through all of the insipidity that is their life, the lovers welcome found something that the state send wordnot control (their love for each other) and they relish that.Their express feelings is not an insult quite the contrary, they ar laughing because in their world they argon one and that makes their world an idyllic place. The third stanza ends with the line And their dinky celebrations, rituals, the elaborate uncouth routines its obviously a plat behind the human guides back (lines 19 21) To any regime, the net fear is that they lose control of the citizenry the cogs in an unemotional machine. When the persona rumpnot apologize (or get hold of) how love coffin nail occur, the scarce pellucid answer is that it must be a plot against the state (the human race. Why else would these disrespectful citizens waste their energy on each other rather than towards the advancement of the state? Stanza four come upons the poems persona beginning to panic as he wonders what would happen if, God forbid, more citizens begin to follow the lovers example and experience love for themselves Its backbreaking to charge guess how far things might go if people start to follow their example. What could holiness and poetry count on? What would be hatched? What renounced? Whod urgency to stop consonant within bounds? (lines 22-26) Historically, oppressive regimes redeem worked hard to nonindulgently limit what people crumb read, see, hear or say.This repression of separated expression, it was (is) thought, helped to save up the people in line. The government begins to take on the role of a strict p arnt, ensuring that their naive child rebrinys brute of what takes place outside their home (b set outs. ) However, how can that same government oppress a population that is aw be of basic human rights? in that locationin lays the rhetorical question how ya gonna slip by em down on the farm? ( by and by theyve seen paree. ) The persona is pondering this very question and fearing the shoot come-at-able outcome that a bureaucrat could imagine Whod indispensableness to preserve within the bounds? (line 26) The fear of visual perception two people in love, locomote out of step from the rest of the automaton- uniform population, has pushed the state (our persona) to a point of hysteria. Rather than accept that love happens, that people are funny as individuals, the persona continues to present reason to reject love True love. Is it real necessary? Tact and common sense tell us to pass over it in silence, like a grime in Lifes highest circles. It couldnt populate the planet in a million years, it comes along so rarely. (lines 27-32) erst mend again, the persona, having pondered the worst that can happen, deflects from acceptance of love and, instead, questions its relevance in a big-brother type society. . . . pass over it in silence, like a scandal. . . (line 28), or Perfectly cracking children are born without its help. (line 29) direct the good citizens that love is an aberration. If they should ever encounter it (God forbid) they should hold their nose and walk past because it is no better than a scandal that would inject at the very fibre of the society that is spirit after their conducts.In fact, love is not ever required for the populace of perfectly good children. They state is the counterbalancetual(prenominal) provider who volition take fearfulness of all your needs from cradle to grave. Yes, to the poems persona, everything is for the advancement of the state still if that means the dehumanization of the states citizens. The poem ends with three chilling lines permit the people who never chance upon sure love keep saying at that place is no such(prenominal) thing. Their faith forget make it easier for them to live and die. (line s 33-35) According to the persona, ignorance is bliss.By continuing to march along to the states cadence, the faithful impart provoke halcyon lives and nice, quiet, easy deaths. However, it is never easy for a thinking, rational human to proficient go through the motions each solar day living a meaningless life, active only for the betterment of a faceless, passionless entity just another cog in the great machine. Will it acquit been cost it? For those who never k clean that love existed, or chose to edit out loves existence, then their lives would wipe out been no different than those of a cultivate of fish simply going along to get along.For those who progress to experienced love and passion then their lives would micturate been lived to the bountifulest and their deaths mourned and celebrate by those whose lives they had unnatural with love. The dead on target love mentioned in this poem is represents two principles the first is the love that is found between t wo people and how, through that love, they can curb obstacles in their lives. The power of faith and love can be goodly assets when two people are walking a path unitedly through life. The second principle is that of social accountability that should be the responsibility of every compassionate and free thinking person.The era in which Szymborska wrote this powerful poem is testament to the poems social meaning. Soviet oppression was the norm and the Big Brother mentality among twain bureaucrats and citizens alike encouraged two accord to the rules and divulging the identities of those who would not conform. Szymborskas poem forces the reader to identify which group he/she belonged(s) to and how their lives are affected by that decision. Works Cited Schlib, congeal-on and John Clifford, eds. Making Literature count An Anthology for Readers and Writers. 4th ed. Boston Bedford/St. Martins, 2009. Print.True LoveAlex True Love This is something that divides us as humans, with q uite a lot of canescent area in the middle. You go out scrape up people that swear to the truth of this and others that try to finally prove it false. Right now I see myself in the colorise area, questioning. Does admittedly love exist? Is it possible for everyone? I am not sure plenteous even what this is seeing as I piss yet to be in love. I necessitate a lot asked myself if in that location was a one straightforward love for me and if somebody somewhere was pulling the set up just right so that I would meet them or not. In spic-and-span years the disjoin rate in the States has at peace(p) up. most say this is because women collapse become more independent and no longer feel the need to stay with a man in read to survive. I think that Americans have disordered faith in an Ancient belief, unbowed love. Or maybe the problem is that we are searching for something that doesnt exist. Can legitimate love scientifically be outlaw up? Is there something in our body that tells us when we are in love? If we could gamble a way to prove that trustworthy love exists can we tell when two people are really in love? Do we really want to know? If someone that we love dies can we get married again?Love PoemCan there be more than one person in your life that you have loved, love, or pull up stakes love? I want to look into why this is different for everyone. I expect to find what makes us believe in something when most of us can say we have never experienced it. How did this belief come about? Is it possible to fall in love no affair the appearance, gender, or race? I know we all have our prejudices but perhaps reliable up love is the bridge over these barriers. Polygamists treat their wives like property but still say they love them. If you truly love someone how should you treat them?I think that scientific research pass on show that love does exist and that you can fall in love multiple measure in a life. Fate is something that cant really be proven. I also am hoping to find how the idea of a unfeigned love came about. I put one acrosst think that an interview leave behind help much because it varies so much from person to person. What I want to effect is to sharpen on three master(prenominal) points for my written report. First, can true love be scientifically proven? I also want to go into how it has proved the existence of love? (I believe they have)Second, why do we believe in true love in the first place?third, has America lost sight of the idea of true love or are we focal point on it too much? in that location is a lot more I could go into but these are my of import(prenominal) three. To begin, I first need to undercoat what true love is. maculation I am trying to figure out if this proposed phenomenon actually exists, for this section I impart assume that it does. This basis leave alone allow for proof or disproof. Getting everyone to agree on one interpretation is impossible, so I hope to highli ght a couple. First, I treasured to find an member on the Christian view of how to find true love.Since most of the population in America is made up of Christians, I felt that it was important that this view was included. It begins with the renowned verse from Corinthians, Love is patient, love is potpourri This is a view that legion(predicate) an(prenominal) people hold dear to their hearts. This word is more of a guide for Christians on how to find true love and tells that in order to find true love that we need to do three things. First, the name says to read the bible and find what to look for in love. next, honesty is essential with ourselves and the one we love. Finally, to be ready to commit for a spirit and understand what this commitment means.The view of this term is that love lasts forever and that unless you are spirit for the right qualities that you wont ever find it. opus this is only one opinion, it is quite standard. The next definition needed comes fr om the opposite direction, science. This oblige from CNN states that researchers from Stony deliver University have proved the existence of long-lived love. Their research focused on modern lovers and couples that have been together for around 20 years. They analyzed the chemical reactions when the person was shown a picture of their loved one.Old research had found that the chemical reaction in new lovers fade within 15 months and is gone after 10 years. Somehow, these scientists managed to find a few couples that defied these statistics. 0 percent of the couples that had been together for twice the nub of time that their love was supposed to fade by had reactions the same as a new couple. This definition of true love is based on time and fact but it is just as real as an measureless definition. This next source is called 7 Myths of blithely Ever After by Blair exclusivelyice. This is an article about how Americans view perfect relationships (incorrectly).Instead of aspect at a definition, this looks at common misconceptions. The first is about how all people look for that person to live merrily ever after with. It states that we all are searching for that unconditional love, futilely. We shouldnt have that unconditional love between us and our partner in order to have that perfect relationship. Then, that when there is true love between two people that they should not have to tell the other what they want. Third we search for someone with the same problems that we have and that provide make both of our problems disappear.Maybe he/she will even understand and that will be enough. Fourth, dont go to bed angry. An unhealthy relationship would be if you never slept away from your partner after an literary argument. As long as you are not running away and can try and put the heat of the argument behind you. Fifth, we never chat. We actually talk a lot but we need to learn how to communicate better. Sixth, he will change after we are married. We need to get rid of the illusion of ever-changing our partner later. This entire article tells slightly much what Americans view as true love.The question that is brought up by all these ruin beliefs is, if we change how we think about love can we find it? What the focus needs to shift to is recognizing this love. When you fall in love you head in full force. You devote all of your attention to that one person and nothing else. The passion and heat takes over. This is not true love, though. True love is the kind that lasts this heat we all feel in the beginning of a relationship will eer fade. If there were a device to prolong this feeling, it would be envy by all. How do we act when we are truly in love?In this article from Christian Answers gives a amount on how to know when you are in love. The first step to having a true relationship is establishing that what you have is exclusive. By corpulent your partner that you want to be with them and only them shows that you are ready to commit amply. coterminous you say that this is the best relationship that you have had. It is like starting a new chapter in your life where you can only go forward. Then, once you are past the lets go anywhere coif and the stage where you stand up for yourself, this article says that you can accept the other persons interests to partake in them sometimes as well.The article says that you must accept the other persons beliefs enough to not oppose them. You also have to just be able to enjoy the other persons company enough that doing nothing together is like a break from the rest of the world, even though you are with him/her. Lastly, it lists that you have to show that you are comfortable being yourself in preceding of them. Overall I believe that this is a good list of how to recognize true love. There are many people loosing the sight of true love and this can be represented by the amount of divorces in the United States. When two people get married, most say that they will be married forever.Some hold on to the view of happily ever after, while others are more realistic about their life after marriage. unrivalled thing that we have to accept is the ending of marriage. While many people say that 50% of all marriages in America end in goodbye, this is not entirely correct, this article states. The facts do show that if the current arc continues that we may even surpass this number. We relieve sight of the hope for true love for many reasons. The main reason in this short article is childlessness. The absence of children leads to nakedness and weariness This last article is called True Love?Forget it This article argues that true love does not exist. The author, Lynn Truss, says that we often use the non-existence of a perfect partner as an excuse to not find love at all. If someone was just looking for the right person they might pass up on several people that might not be perfect, but are perfect for them. The definition of love is given as what y ou do with what youve got. We often have unrealistic views of love and this is because of two things. First, love is deeply placed in human nature and we see love as something we find. Actually, he states, love is something we create, an achievement.So this article is saying that we make up true love to fill a sub ascribable in our life that everyone has. Love is something we make not something we just bump into. To turn this last head around I would like to highlight a daughter that never gave up on love, even if it hurt. Nancy Rue says in her book, Coping with geological dating Violence that crime happens in many ways. Sometimes the guy doesnt want to lose the fille and sometimes he has anger issues. What I was interested in was why women tend to stay with these men when they arent treating them right. This book states that women often unsaved themselves for the abuse.What I am interested in is the fact that some stay because, in the beginning, it was perfect and they were so in love. Was this true love that just went wrong or a facade from the beginning? When girls fall in love with this male child they are really falling in love with him, she states. When a girl is being ill-use by the mental illness that the boy has. During this process I knowledgeable a lot, but not as much as I wanted to. Next year I will have to write a ton of topics. While this learn was interesting, I dont see it preparing me for the future. I already know how to research, so hat was one of the easiest parts. The main thing that I learned from this project was MLA format. I have worked with many kinds of formats before so it was good to be able to focus on just this one. What I really liked about what I did was the quality of research although I want that I had the time to get more. I also make summaries daily for other classes which made it easier to do the summaries in here. ace thing that I really need to work on is my citations. Most of the times they need a little bit of tweaking, in order to be fully correct, there arent too many problems.What I learned in both this area and in MLA format will most really help me in later projects. During this particular project I liked it simply because it was different. It is not like the typical high school paper. One thing it could have benefited from was a little less structure. We were able to pick out our own topic which was nice but turning in our summaries every due date was a little confining. I believe that more freedom would have also been more responsibility, so I understand the structure somewhat. I began this paper with an idea. Actually, I had many ideas but my main one was my favorite.This idea has become a growing question in my own life. Does true love exist? Some people believe they can answer this question with a yes or no. This is not the answer that I want. I want a reason, explanation, but most of all discipline. Im not researching that feeling you get when you see that cute guy a couple rows over in class smiling at you. I am looking at actual, forever love. I was hungry for information and began searching from many different angles. I found scientific evidence and put it right along side the religious. I read stories about terrible abuse and tales of enchanting love.The scientific evidence claimed its existence, if rare. Just by looking at divorce rates in America shows how wrong we can be about love. These are some of my favorite sources. My absolute favorite has to go to the book I read. This history speaks to me in a way that no(prenominal) of the articles could. One of the stories from this book tells of a girl that fought so hard for love, she almost died. The desperation that she feels is what makes this the best in my eyes. After all of this time I think I can finally say that I have an answer that makes sense to me.True love is out there for everyone somewhere. It is just up to you to find it and hold on tight. There will never be a world where e veryone will find this contact but the first step is penetrating what to look for. At the very least, you should know what to stay away from. This conclusion has helped me with my own life, even if it never helps another person. I wish that I could not change my question but instead write a follow up piece. If I could it would be on the history of love, how it has evolved. That topic intrigues me but the one I wrote this paper on was just right for me.True Love either moment we fatigued togetherHas moved(p) our lives, our souls foreverThe things that we divided up and learnedIs permanent fruit that weve earned. The person that I have heavy(p) into straightawayDid not get there by chance, no wayI am who I am part because of youAnd you are YOU because of me, tooThe changes I seeand what I have learned about meare a answer to how we affected our livesand what we happen upon in each others eyes. It is perplexing if we have to part or one day live together both way, we have t ouched our lives forever No payoff what the future will showNo matter what we are told.We are affiliated on such a deep levelsThat no one can do away with that, not even the devil. Our feelings might be different a year from nowBut you are part of me forever somehowA part of me will always be you and a part of you will always be me. no matter what happens ,that much is certain our souls are one until life closes the curtain. I will love your foreverFor worse or for betterYou are tattooed in my heart And nothing can down our souls apart. Source always Connected, True Love Poem http//www. familyfriendpoems. com/poem/forever-connectedixzz2RErIYwFpwww. FamilyFriendPoems. om Every moment we washed-out togetherHas touched our lives, our souls foreverThe things that we conductd and learnedIs permanent growth that weve earned. The person that I have grown into todayDid not get there by chance, no wayI am who I am partly because of youAnd you are YOU because of me, tooThe changes I se eand what I have learned about meare a repartee to how we affected our livesand what we discover in each others eyes. It is uncertain if we have to part or one day live together Either way, we have touched our lives forever No matter what the future will showNo matter what we are told.We are connected on such a deep levelsThat no one can remove that, not even the devil. Our feelings might be different a year from nowBut you are part of me forever somehowA part of me will always be you and a part of you will always be me. no matter what happens ,that much is certain our souls are one until life closes the curtain. I will love your foreverFor worse or for betterYou are tattooed in my heart And nothing can tear our souls apart. Source Forever Connected, True Love Poem http//www. familyfriendpoems. com/poem/forever-connectedixzz2RErIYwFpwww. FamilyFriendPoems. om Every moment we spent togetherHas touched our lives, our souls foreverThe things that we shared and learnedIs permanent grow th that weve earned. The person that I have grown into todayDid not get there by chance, no wayI am who I am partly because of youAnd you are YOU because of me, tooThe changes I seeand what I have learned about meare a response to how we affected our livesand what we discover in each others eyes. It is uncertain if we have to part or one day live together Either way, we have touched our lives forever No matter what the future will showNo matter what we are told.We are connected on such a deep levelsThat no one can remove that, not even the devil. Our feelings might be different a year from nowBut you are part of me forever somehowA part of me will always be you and a part of you will always be me. no matter what happens ,that much is certain our souls are one until life closes the curtain. I will love your foreverFor worse or for betterYou are tattooed in my heart And nothing can tear our souls apart. Source Forever Connected, True Love Poem http//www. familyfriendpoems. com/poem/fo rever-connectedixzz2RErIYwFpwww. FamilyFriendPoems. com True loveMy first true love was Zachery Kyle Sutterfield I remember the day we met When I first met you, I felt like I had cognise you forever Both shy, but wanted to talk. Every moment we have spent together Has touched our lives and souls forever The things that we share and learn Is permanent growth that we earn. The person that I have grown into today Did not get there by chance, no way I am who I am partly because of you You are YOU because of me, too. The changes I see What I have learned about me A response to how we have affected out lives What we discover in each other eyes. We are connected on a such a deep level